|
The War on Drugs
If the government can't keep drugs away from inmates who are locked
in steel cages, surrounded by barbed wire, watched by armed guards, drug-tested,
strip-searched, X-rayed, and videotaped – how can it possibly stop
the flow of drugs to an entire nation? – Ron Crickenberger
Libertarians believe that all drugs should be re-legalized. Drug addiction
causes some problems, but the War on Drugs has been so harmful to America
that it cannot be justified.
Many people think drugs should be illegal for two reasons: to discourage
an unhealthy habit and to discourage the crime that is associated with
drug use. But illegality is of questionable effectiveness in discouraging
use, and it unquestionably makes crime far worse.
Making drugs illegal might discourage people from trying them, although
it can also make them seem more attractive (the “rebel” factor).
However, libertarians assert that it is not the proper role of government
to act as nanny, to protect us from making potentially bad decisions.
After all, using or selling drugs itself doesn’t necessarily hurt
anyone else.
But being arrested or jailed does hurt people – the incarcerated
and their families, the taxpayers, our economy. The U.S. has the highest
incarceration rate in the world – we have one-quarter of all the
world’s prisoners – and drug offenders make up 25% of U.S.
inmates. And forty percent of drug arrests are merely for possession of
marijuana: 750,000 people become part of the criminal justice system each
year for relaxing harmlessly.
All this hurts our economy (which means fewer jobs). The Drug-War Industrial
Complex wastes probably $50 billion a year of our tax money on drug enforcement
and imprisonment. Also, none of those people sitting in jail are able
to contribute to our economy by working, and having a prison record may
prevent them from obtaining good (legal) jobs after release.
However, the most terrible cost of the drug war has been the erosion
of our civil liberties, and this doesn’t just mean cold medicine
restrictions here in Iowa. The government can seize your property on mere
suspicion of drug activity (no “innocent until proven guilty”).
And each year, heavily-armed police SWAT teams conduct 40,000 paramilitary
invasions of homes to serve warrants on mostly non-violent drug users.
These terrifying raids usually occur at night when people think they are
safe in their beds, and dozens of non-violent and innocent people have
accidentally been killed this way.
Other innocent people have been jailed for life for merely knowing someone
who was arrested for selling drugs and “turned them in” to
get a lighter sentence. These horrors will only get worse, as the drug
warriors desperately demand more and more power in order to show some
results. These are terrible threats to our freedom, and cannot be excused
by the possibility that legalization might (or might not) result in a
few more addicts.
If recreational drugs were legalized, they would be manufactured by reputable
companies and sold at the corner drugstore. And they would be cheap: it
is estimated that cocaine would only cost 10 cents per dose for large
manufacturers to make.
This would result in three beneficial effects: First, drug users would
not need to commit crimes to afford drugs. (27% of federal prisoners admit
committing their offence for money to buy drugs.)
Second, criminals would no longer be able to manufacture or distribute
drugs, because they wouldn’t be able to compete with more efficient
reputable companies. (Who would buy from a trailer meth lab if higher-quality,
less-expensive drugs were available at Walgreens?) This would greatly
reduce violent crime – nearly 40% of New York City’s murders
in 1999 were drug-trade related, and the figure for Iowa is about 20%.
Third, the decline in drug-related crime would free up law enforcement
to concentrate on violent and property crimes, which would result in a
safer society for all of us and cost taxpayers less too.
Yes, but how can being able to buy heroin at Walgreen’s be a good
thing? Won’t we become a nation of addicts? The evidence suggests
the opposite. In Holland, marijuana use is legal but a far smaller percent
of the population uses it than here. And even if the addiction rate did
rise, we know how to prevent and treat addiction, without the violence
and police-state side effects.
Drug abuse is bad, but the drug war is much worse. It’s time we
eliminate this big government war on our people. That’s the libertarian
way.
|