|
'Springing forward' is wrong
By Beth Cody, Writers’ Group member
Iowa City Press-Citizen
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
This Sunday is the day hated by many: the day in which government has
decreed that we must all change our clocks ahead one hour. Yes, I'm referring
to Daylight Savings Time.
The second Sunday of each March we are obliged to set our clocks ahead
by one hour, and this is reversed in November. Proponents of DST believe
that much of the extra sunlight during longer summer days is "wasted"
by shining in the early morning hours, when relatively few people are
awake. Then during Autumn, we must change back so that there is not too
little morning sunlight, with people driving to work in total darkness.
Other justifications given for DST include theoretically saving energy,
encouraging increased healthy outdoor activity and making driving safer.
But these benefits are not actually as beneficial as we have been led
to believe, and there are numerous ill effects brought on by our twice-yearly
government-imposed time shifts that should make us reconsider the costs
and benefits of DST.
Healthwise, humans are not machines to be instantly reprogrammed without
side effects. Our bodies have circadian rhythms that take weeks to adjust,
and the "Spring Forward" is particularly hard on us.
Studies have shown that heart attacks increase during the several days
following the Spring change, and both car accidents and industrial accidents
likewise increase due to sleepiness. There is some evidence of increased
suicides, and seasonal affective disorder can worsen due to less morning
sunlight.
And in the Fall, when we revert back to standard time, the sudden switch
results in a substantial increase in pedestrian deaths, because both motorists
and pedestrians are mentally unprepared for the hazards of an earlier
dusk.
The economic effects of DST are also likely underestimated.
First, there is no evidence that we are actually saving any energy at
all. The studies are contradictory and those that show savings at all
indicate only a miniscule amount. In fact, a study done in Indiana, which
only adopted statewide DST in 2006, shows that residential energy use
actually increased by 1%-4% in the counties that adopted DST.
The theory behind saving energy is that people will use electric lights
less during lighter evenings. However, energy-use patterns have changed
much in the past half-century: air-conditioning is now widespread and
DST means temperatures stay warmer later, necessitating longer energy-guzzling
AC use. Also, evening activities are now more likely to include watching
television or surfing the net than enjoying outdoor recreation. Thus the
energy increase.
And despite being told for decades that farmers benefit from DST, the
opposite is actually true, since farmers need dew to dry on crops earlier,
and they like an earlier sunset so they can go home at a decent hour.
Prime-time television suffers during later summer hours. Oh, and outdoor
movie theaters were completely destroyed by later summer sunsets.
And then there's the economic costs of millions of people taking the
time to physically re-set their clocks, the missed appointments, the lost
productivity of tired, cranky people, and the occasional industrial disasters
and medical mishaps resulting from erroneous automatic clock resets.
However, it is true that retailers and sporting goods manufacturers benefit
from later shopping and sports participation hours. The lobbyists from
those industries were largely responsible for the adoption of DST in the
first place, so I suppose we should be happy that we are endangering and
inconveniencing ourselves for their benefit.
The question is: during the summers when we would already enjoy later
sunsets anyway, do we really need an extra hour of sunlight in the evenings
badly enough to justify the unhealthy and costly effects of Daylight Savings
Time?
This Sunday, when remembering to turn your clock ahead and check your
smoke detectors, don't forget to question the wisdom of government meddling
with something as fundamental as the time of day.
|